Did Adolf Hitler Ever Win The Nobel Peace Prize

Adolf Hitler, a controversial German leader, is known for his extreme politics throughout World War 2 and his reign of terror. His striking presence and strong words left a mark on the 20th Century, and some might wonder if he ever won a Nobel Peace Prize. In this article we’ll explore the answer to this question, as well as analyze what this event would have meant.

First, an overview of Hitler’s life is necessary. Born in Austria, he joined the German Workers’ Party in the early 1920s and rose to become its leader. After a failed coup in 1923, he retreated to prison, where he wrote his autobiography, Mein Kampf. By 1933 he was Chancellor of Germany, establishing a totalitarian dictatorship and leading the country into World War 2. Since 1945, he is seen as the furthest example of extreme politics.

Now, has he ever won a Nobel Prize? The answer is no. Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1939, the same year World War 2 began. However, Nobel Laureates are not selected based on their nominations; instead, the Nobel Assembly assesses both the nomination and if the individual merits the award. After evaluating Hitler’s nomination and his actions prior to World War 2, it was determined that he did not meet the criteria. He was not the recipient. Ironically, the 1939 Peace Prize was awarded to the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Certainly, if Hitler had won the Nobel Peace Prize, the award would have taken on a completely different meaning. The Nobel Prize is statutorily awarded each year for the advancement of peace and human rights. Hitler’s reputation for brutal policies, dictatorship and bloodshed would have undermined the Prize’s goal and contradicted its ideals.

Some conflict exists over whether or not Hitler deserved the nomination. The Nobel Peace Prize nomination for 1939 was proposed by two Norwegian parliamentarians who were intending to cause controversy and draw attention to Adolf’s oppressive policies. Although the nomination was not successful, it was nonetheless seen as a symbol of admiration by the Nazis and Hitler himself. In response, a list of accused individuals was created, including Nobel Prize winner Carl von Ossietzky, as a way to suggest that the Prize should not have gone to him.

The controversy surrounding Hitler’s nomination also provoked a widespread discussion on the role of a government in deciding the future of a nation and its citizens. Questions were raised regarding the motivations behind Hitler’s actions and whether or not they fit within the scope of the Nobel Prize criteria. Through this debate, some argued that the Prize should not be given to those who followed oppressive and inhumane tactics, as doing so would be contrary to the Prize’s purpose and message.

It is important to recognize what did not happen: Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany, never won the Nobel Peace Prize during his rule from 1933 to 1945. Although he was nominated in 1939, the decision was unanimously rejected by the Committee. Although his candidacy provoked a series of debates and discussions, the Nobel Prize continued to stand for its original purpose: to advance the cause of peace and human rights.

Analysis of Impact

The impact of Hitler’s nomination and rejection to the Nobel Prize had a broad impact on the international community as a whole. It served as a reminder that there are consequences to oppressive actions and a strong totalitarian government, and it brought attention to the value of a democratic society. At the same time, it raised questions regarding what actions are permitted by a nation and what standards must be met to win a Nobel Prize.

The debate also brought light to the criteria of the Prize itself, since it was a reminder of the standards a person must meet to win the Prize. Through the rejection of Hitler’s candidacy, the Nobel Committee demonstrated a commitment to selecting Laureates who had dedicated themselves to advancing the cause of peace and human rights, and that no one, regardless of power or influence, could be exempt from upholding these values.

Discussion of Hitler’s Legacy

The legacy of Adolf Hitler is complicated, for obvious reasons. He is still seen as one of the most extreme leaders of the twentieth century, and his ideologies and ideology still linger in some parts of the world. Although he won a legion of followers during his regime, the vast majority of people today still reject him and his philosophies of racial supremacy and violence.

A closer examination of Hitler’s legacy reveals his failure to fulfill his objectives. After years of persecution and war, his rule was ultimately halted in 1945, causing significant damage to Germany and the world. The impact of these events still lingers in contemporary politics, and they are a reminder that the actions of a single person can have a major impact on the international community.

Critics’ Opinions

Critics of Hitler have characterized his legacy as one of terror and destruction, and many believe that he should not have been nominated for the Nobel Prize. His policies and tactics in pursuit of his goals of dominance were seen as extreme and inhumane, and they were in direct contradiction with the values and purpose of the Nobel Prize. Some argue that nominating him for the Prize was a further perpetuation of his violent ideology.

Others have noted that Hitler’s reach extended beyond the scope of domestic policy, with his influence being felt around the world. These critics argue that awarding Hitler a Nobel Prize would tend to legitimize his tactics, thereby creating an environment in which extreme ideologies can take hold and normalize these deeds.

Reactions to Hitler’s Nomination

Reactions to Hitler’s nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize were mixed, to say the least. On one hand, some viewed it as a mockery of the Prize, while others argued that it was a sign of admiration for him in some circles. Many also questioned it as a reminder that oppressive regimes should be rejected and held accountable for their actions.

Several countries condemned Hitler’s nomination, concerned that it would undermine the integrity of the Nobel Prize. The Swedish Parliament even went so far as to demand the Committee to reconsider their decision, but this had no effect on the outcome. Regardless, the nomination provoked a series of debates and discussions that ultimately contributed to the Prize’s mission and reinforced its values of peace and human rights.


In conclusion, Adolf Hitler never won a Nobel Peace Prize, though he was nominated in 1939. The decision was unanimously rejected by the Nobel Assembly due to his oppressive tactics prior to World War 2. His candidacy sparked a series of debates and discussions on the criteria of the Prize and the role of a government in shaping the future of a nation. Ultimately, this resulted in an understanding that oppressive governments should be held accountable for their actions and that no leader or individual should be exempt from upholding the values of the Nobel Prize.

Elizabeth Baker is an experienced writer and historian with a focus on topics related to famous world dictators. She has over 10 years of experience researching, writing, and editing history books and articles. Elizabeth is passionate about uncovering lost stories from the past and sharing interesting facts about some of the most notorious dictators in history. In her writing, she emphasizes how dictators can still affect modern-day politics and society. She currently lives in Seattle, Washington where she continues to write and research for her latest projects.

Leave a Comment